Software patents: foolish business. Guardian editorial
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 03:25PM
Saturday, September 10, 2011 at 03:25PM
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 04:27PM
Sunday, August 21, 2011 at 03:24PM
Friday, August 19, 2011 at 04:44PM "There is a fundamental problem with patents in the United States.
It is us.
By that I mean all of us: the companies and people who directly interact with the patent system, the media that reports on those interactions, the analysts and experts who inform the media, and finally the large, active, and vocal readership that we try and service with our reporting. As a group, we have accepted and let lie the lazy conventional wisdom that the patent system is broken beyond repair, a relic of a previous time that has been obsoleted by the rapid pace of technical innovation, particularly in software, and that it should perhaps be scrapped altogether."
http://thisismynext.com/2011/08/11/broken-patent-system/
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 04:33PM
Monday, August 15, 2011 at 03:46PM
Saturday, August 6, 2011 at 03:47PM
"Google’s only play is try to acquire enough patents to work towards a mutual assured destruction agreement with their rivals. But again, that’s going to be hard given who they’re going up against. This leaves three options: 1) appeal to the courts. 2) appeal to the public for support. 3) pray."
Monday, August 1, 2011 at 04:38PM This conference, co-sponsored by the Brookings Institution, the Computer & Communications Industry Association and Duke University School of Law, looked at the problem of abstract patents from both economic and legal perspectives. How well do abstract patents work? What problems do they create? Can we do better than the standard in Bilski?
http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0114_patents.aspx
Monday, August 1, 2011 at 04:32PM